Comparing 7 iPhones: Camera (Technical)

Checking the iPhone cameras' field of view

One of the things I've noticed about the iPhone's camera is that its field of view seemed to change with each generation, especially in the early days. This meant that the focal length was different. While the EXIF data does show the 35mm equivalent focal length, I wondered if this was really accurate. I wanted to check this out before doing deeper comparison.

Device
(Orig. Photo)
Focal Length
(Actual mm)
35mm Equiv.
(Reported)
35mm Equiv.
(Measured)
iPhone 6S+ 4.15 29 30.2
iPhone 6+ 4.15 29 30.1
iPhone 5S 4.15 29 30.0
iPhone 5 4.12 33 32.2
iPhone 4S 4.28 35 32.8
iPhone 4 3.85 35 33.2
iPhone 3GS 3.85 35 37.2

By taking photos of a tape measure from a set distance and calculating the focal length with a formula, this is what I got. The last three generations have been stable - they all report 29mm, and the actual measurements are nearly the same at around 30mm. For the three generations before that, the measured values are around 32 to 33mm, although the reported values exceed this by a mm or two.

Interestingly, 3GS has the longest focal length of all at about 37mm. It isn't particularly good for selfies or group photos, and since it didn't have a front-facing camera, this was doubly unfortunate. As the selfies and wide-angle lenses became popular, perhaps Apple saw this as a problem and kept reducing the focal length until iPhone 5S in addition to adding the front-facing camera.

ISO 12233:2000 resolution measurements with iPhone cameras

Now I decided to figure out the optical resolutions of the iPhone cameras. This is done by using the ISO 12233:2000 chart and looking at the test lines to see how far each of the lines remain distinguishable. I've done this test five years ago with 3GS, and I had promised to revisit it with newer iPhones. It's rather long overdue, but it's definitely worth it.

Considering the processing done to the output photos, conventional sensors would be alright with Lines per Picture Height (LPH) being 65% or greater of the sensor resolution. Let's see how the iPhones have progressed throughout the years. The photos were taken in a sufficiently well-lit room so that the lowest ISO setting would automatically be chosen by the default camera app.

Device
(Orig. Photo)
Vertical Pixel Count Vertical LPH (Resolution) Percentage
iPhone 6S+ 3,024 2,000 66%
iPhone 6+ 2,448 1,700 69%
iPhone 5S 2,448 1,700 69%
iPhone 5 2,448 1,800 74%
iPhone 4S 2,448 1,800 74%
iPhone 4 1,936 1,400 72%
iPhone 3GS 1,536 1,000 65%

Sharpening applied to the image processing during the iPhone 4 to 5 eras have apparently enhanced the percentage slightly, while the more recent ones have toned this down and still maintained the numbers in the high 60s. So it seems that the optical resolution has been kept up with the increase in the sensor's pixel count more or less. It does seem that, to go beyond 12 megapixels used in 6S Plus, Apple may need to opt for a sensor size increase to avoid degradation in quality.

Testing readability of faraway signs

Original Photo ISO Shutter Speed
iPhone 6S+ 25 1/381
iPhone 6+ 32 1/449
iPhone 5S 32 1/540
iPhone 5 50 1/376
iPhone 4S 50 1/365
iPhone 4 80 1/355
iPhone 3GS 64 1/449

So how does these technical characteristics translate to real-life results? Consider a situation where you're trying to read the letters on the signs far away. To read clearly, either the camera would have to have longer focal length or the sensor would need a higher optical resolution.

As you can see here, iPhone 6S Plus' higher optical resolution produced largest and most clear letters despite having one of the shortest focal length. Meanwhile, the longer focal length coupled with sharper images let iPhone 5 produce letters that are nearly as clear.

At this point, it's pretty clear that iPhone 4S is where Apple set the basic tone of how an iPhone camera should perform under sufficient light. But not all the photos are taken at such an optimal situation. I'll soon be looking at how Apple came to tackle the non-optimal ones.

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

This link is not meant to be clicked. It contains the trackback URI for this entry. You can use this URI to send ping- & trackbacks from your own blog to this entry. To copy the link, right click and select "Copy Shortcut" in Internet Explorer or "Copy Link Location" in Mozilla.

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as Linear | Threaded

No comments

Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

Copyright (C) 1996-2024 Woo-Duk Chung (Wesley Woo-Duk Hwang-Chung). All rights reserved.