Wesley's Tool-Box

• Getting the Parts (cont.)

To keep up with the portability theme, the good old 106-key Windows standard keyboard (this is the case for Korean keyboards; one key for English-Korean conversion and one key for Korean-Chinese conversion are added to the default US keyboard layout)was not to be used. If you've ever used a notebook computer and complained about the tight keyboard it has, you know how huge a normal keyboard can get. Those 'natural' keyboards with twisted key arrangements or those wacky 'internet' keyboards with superfluous buttons are even bigger. BTC was selling some 'specialty' keyboards such as mini-keyboards and wireless keyboards, so I got myself the mini-keyboard from them. Not surprisingly, this keyboard's characteristics were remarkably similar to that of a keyboard integrated in a notebook, and the Logitech TrackMan portable trackball I've been using with my old 486 notebook (not the one pictured in the first page, though) clamped perfectly to the side of the keyboard.

Then it occured to me that, in order to make a computer case, I needed some LEDs and buttons and the dinky beeper-speaker. Since these come standard when you buy a computer case, I never gave much thought to them, but now that I'm the one making the case, I needed to supply these on my own. Fortunately, the Yongsan electronics market is chock full of all computer parts, and I effortlessly obtained the necessary parts from a store that sells computer cases as 'replacement' parts for a couple of bucks.

For the heatsink, I bought a Zalman CNPS2005 flower heatsink, as a website was doing a group purchase on these coolers and got it on a good deal. However, I couldn't use the 80mm fan that came with it because it would be too large; I pulled out a 60mm fan I keep for testing for use with it. The Duron CPU has not been arrived at the time of the photo, so my t-bird CPU was shown instead.

• Designing the Case

With most parts pretty much on my hands, I needed to revise my original thoughts of the casing with actual measurements and positioning. Though the measurement I had did not differ significantly, the positioning of the components revealed that my initial design had some flaws. Also, my dad hinted that my design was rather complex, and told me to make it as simple as possible so that it won't be so difficult to make or become fragile. His words were to be taken seriously, as he's an engineer. I took my original design and simplified it so that it could be made from just six panels, not the original eight. Then I somehow needed to visualize my design. I needed a CAD program. I downloaded a freeware CAD program from the web, took a 30-minute crash-course on using it with the internal tutorial, and came up with this.

Would this design survive? We'll see...

• Getting the Parts

With the basic component decisions made, I then went onto buying the parts needed. I initially wanted to get a motherboard with DDR-SDRAM support, but they were rare, and the DDR SDRAM themselves were even rarer, which is something I hated because my country makes 1/3 of world's memory chips and probably half of that is made from that Samsung factory a few miles away from my dormitory. I heard most are immediately shipped to United States. Anyhow, with DDR out of question, I looked into getting a KT133A chipset motherboard, as these boards were reported to put out admirable performance compared to DDR counterparts due to the support 133MHz FSB, which was officially missing in other Athlon chipsets.

Having enjoyed some good Asus boards lately, my first consideration was A7V133. Alas, it was carrying a hefty price tag. Then I saw a website planning to do a group purchase (and thus cheaper compared to buying normally) on Abit K7TA, another well reviewed board. I was highly anticipating this, but the purchase was cancelled due to local distributor's supply problem. Frustrated, I searched for any KT133A boards that could fit my bill. It was then I found Soltek's SL-75KAV. I was never much of a fan of Soltek, but I didn't have much against them either, so I bit the bullet and ordered it online.

Looking at the motherboard, I could see that I needed a power supply that would somehow have to fit within the board without making the case thick. This is impossible with a normal ATX power supply, so I needed something different. Most of the places only sold the normal ATX versions, but Seventeam's Korean distributor was selling lots of different power supplies online. I browsed through the list and found just the thing I need; the slender micro-NLX power supply. It's longer, but also much thinner and narrow. It would fit perfectly over the expansion card slots, which would never be used. The only problem was that their most powerful version, ST-150SL, had maximum output of 150W, far below what would be normally considered for an Athlon-type system. Still, I didn't have much choice; I clicked on the order button.

SL-75KAV motherboard's design brought me some luck. There was enough space for a 3.5" hard disk on either the expansion slot area or over the RAM slot area. Since the power supply was to take the expansion slot area, the hard disk was to be placed over the RAM's, right next to the CPU. IDE cable doesn't have to be twisted or take a long trip, so the location seemed to be good enough. What with the money I have, I bought a 30GB version of the IBM Deskstar 75GXP model, one of the highest performing ATA100-compliant drives that was on the market at the time. It's still a good performer as of the time of the writing.

Yet another luck I had was that there were indeed some slim video card that didn't use an outdated chipset. LEOTEC's line of GeForce2 MX cards were one of these. They follow the reference design, but did not use the upper vacent space for putting words like 'GeForce2 MX' across and instead just cut it off entirely, possibly for saving costs. They just put that identification in a form of a sticker and put it on the RAM. The cost-saving part was pretty valid, as they were one of the cheapest MX card I could buy. They did have a 5.5ns rated RAM, so they didn't skimp on the actual parts inside. I was happily surprised that this RAM could be clocked up to 248MHz (almost 4ns) easily without any modifications.

To make some room for the hard disk to be placed over the RAM, I went on to look for some 'slim' RAMs. KingMax RAMs are such an example, as the chips used in the module are made in the form of Small Ball Grid Array chips, making the module up to 1cm shorter than other modules. A 128MB PC150 version was on sale and I got myself one of these.

Of course, this doesn't end here...

• CPU Considerations

Though in the coming months it may become different, 'Athlon' of today and 'Portable' are some sort of oxymoron. The T-bird Athlon's maximum power dissipation is already around 70W, comparable to an ordinary light bulb. Actual power consumption is higher than that. This is is a bit too much, even for a desktop system, considering high-end CPU's of half a decade ago usually consumed 1/10th of this. T-bird is arguably one of the fastest desktop PC CPU's, but it certainly shows this was done in a very 'brute force' manner. Some 'mobile' Duron notebooks have come out, but we know that it's just our usual Durons that've been underclocked and under-voltaged. Its power consumption is still more than twice that of a competing product. 'Palomino' revision of Athlons, which promise to consume far less energy while delivering more computing power, may change all this, but I couldn't sit around waiting for this chip, and I think it was relevant, considering the release of this CPU has been pushed back already somewhat.

You might be thinking at this point, 'then why don't you just use an Intel CPU, which consumes less power yet performing similar to AMD chips?' This was because my main systems were already using AMD platform, as apparent in my other articles. I needed to buy parts as I made money, using parts from my original system in the mean time. Going straight to Intel platform was not viable. Therefore, I decided to use the Duron as the CPU. They perform nicely and don't consume power as much as T-birds.

• On-board Video Sucks!

On to other things, I planned to use as much normal desktop components as possible to ensure best performance. However, to make the system portable, the casing had to be kept low-profile. One of the biggest thing that hinders this is the card in the expansion slot. Most of these could be replaced with external versions, but video card cannot. So the on-board video had to be considered. But this thought was thrown out almost immediately; I'd rather buy a notebook with Rage Mobility video chip than on-board video, and motherboards with on-board video for AMD platform was nearly non-existent in Korea at the time. The video card had to be kept in somehow, just as I chose a Duron for CPU despite the power consumption. Besides, if I wanted a unit with on-board video, there are already some low-profile systems, even a bare-bone one that I can equip with components of my choice, that utilize this sort of motherboards inside. I would have no point in making this. I had to find a video card that isn't so tall.

Another thing that had me rolling in my bed for another day was the hard disk. The big question was wheter I should use a 2.5" notebook hard disk or a normal 3.5" hard disk. This had to be thought of carefully because a 3.5" hard disk is about 1/4 of the size of a normal motherboard. You might think this isn't so large, but considering the fact that I have to cramp it in somewhere that won't interfere with a power supply, a CPU, or a video card meant that it would be a real tough job. Since you can fit 4 of those 2.5" hard disks into an area that a 3.5" counterpart takes up, it seemed to be a better solution. But there are obvious setbacks: they are expensive, slow, and small in capacity. I also needed a converter so I could plug it with a normal IDE cable. I decided that I would think of this one as I go along because a slight design change would make all the difference.

Don't be bored yet, guys. There are still more to come...

• Asking Too Much?

I had a dream. I dreamt there would be a portable computer that was just as good or better in terms of all areas of performance compared to a real desktop system. Sure, we've seen many state-of-the-art notebook computers that touts themselves as 'desktop replacements'. I do not doubt they would indeed be a desktop replacement in business sector, as the high-end spectrum of these machines sport components that challenge many mid-to-high performance desktop models, such as mobile 1GHz CPU.

However, there are shortcomings. Lots of them, actually. First of all, the prices go shooting up the stratosphere, in a much bigger proportion than a normal desktop version, as you add features, be it for usability or performance. Also, to make it compact, notebook computers sacrifice performance and it cannot outperform desktop counterpart even if similarly equipped. The most notable area of this would be 3D acceleration, as today's 3D enabled video chips require too much power compared to a 'normal' notebook video chip, which hindered the release of powerful 3D enabled notebook video chips. Yes, there has been releases of GeForce Go and mobile Radeon chips which claims to come close to their famed desktop counterparts, but notebook units that use these chips are still hard to find.

• Taking the Plunge

Besides, I would have never been fully comfortable even if I had given a 1GHz notebook computer with GeForce Go video chip. As my other articles profoundly show, I'm an overclocker who build my own system from ground up and push around the limits of what I've made. Pushing around a notebook computer, let alone 'making' a notebook is unlike anything desktop-ish. Notebook designs are not standardized, hence limiting customization and tweaking. You run on pretty much what you've initially bought, give or take a few options and many tweaking programs out there won't function well in a notebook system. You can't simply buy a notebook casing like you would with a middle-tower desktop, nor could you buy a notebook motherboard off the shelf.

Still, I wanted to carry my main system back and forth my dorm room and my home some 400km away(for those that are not metric-centric, it's 250 miles), which I do on a regular basis, and that huge chunk of a middle tower system with 17-inch monitor just won't cut it, not to mention risking bone fracture. All these thoughts hit me while I was rolling around my bed in early February, in the midst of the winter vacation. And so, I was set out to make things right. I wanted an Athlon system. Portable.